Category Archives: Noticias, conferencias y llamados

A Phinance Online Seminar: ‘Taking the floor’ by D. Beunza

A Phinance Online Seminar: ‘Taking the floor’ by D. Beunza. 17:00 CET, 13 October 2021. Open to the public.

Modeling and governing finance are not two separate things. This is one of the main lessons that sociology and the nascent philosophy of finance have taught us. The powerful interrelation between the models, the behavior, and the organization of financial markets is the focus of Daniel Beunza’s book ‘Taking the Floor: Models, Morals, and Management in a Wall Street Trading Room’ (Princeton University Press). Beunza explores how the extensive use of financial modeling and trading technologies over the last few decades has changed and influenced ‘Wall Street’. In his book, he examines how models have reshaped financial markets and changed moral behavior in organizations, creating both opportunities and dangers. To do this, he takes us to the pulsating center of the financial markets—the floor of a trading firm. This meeting of the Phinance Online Seminars will discuss Daniel’s book with contributions from Donald MacKenzie (Edinburgh), Katherine K. Chen (CUNY), José Ossandón (Copenhagen Business School), Michael Barzelay (LSE), and Daniel himself, which will be followed by an open debate.

Continue reading

SASE Best Books

Dear SASE community, we are delighted to announce the 2021 Alice Amsden Best Book Award winner, Sorting Out the Mixed Economy: The Rise and Fall of Welfare and Developmental States in the Americas by historian Amy Offner.
The award committee members have also awarded an honorable mention to Neoliberal Resilience: Lessons in Democracy and Development from Latin America and Eastern Europe by Aldo Madariaga.  Congratulations to Professors Offner and Madariaga, and huge thanks to the Alice Amsden Best Book Award committee members Leslie McCall (chair), Matthew Amengual, Margarita Estevez-Abe, and Gernot Grabher for their efforts! Please find more about these two exceptional books and the committee’s decision here.

CFP_Special Issue: Multiple Markets Call for Papers

[André Vereta-Nahoum avisa de este llamado a contribuir al número especial en Consumption Markets & Culture que edita junto a Christian Frankel]

Special Issue: Multiple Markets Call for Papers. Manuscript deadline: September 30th, 2021. Special issue Editors: Christian Frankel (Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School) & André Vereta-Nahoum (Department of Sociology, University of Sao Paulo).

In some situations, more than one market can be found at the same time and in the same space. In such situations, one market is often not easily distinguished from other markets. What at first may seem like one market may show in fact to be multiple markets. Buying an ice cream, for example, can simultaneously be part of an ice cream market as well as part of a snack market (Loasby, 1999, p. 111). Also, when the market identified by a competition authority in a decision on antitrust differs from the market identified by the firms involved (Onto, 2014), we may be pointed to a multiple market situation. Moreover, marketplaces located geographically in one place, such as The Night Market, in Sao Paulo, sometimes show to be a simultaneity of multiple market settings with different boundaries defined by its actors (Vereta-Nahoum, 2019). Indeed, there are reasons to believe that such simultaneity of market contexts amid exchange interactions is a relatively common situation. Actors and analysts construe “markets” in multiple different ways, and sometimes do not even recognize a crowd exchanging things as a market.

Market orthodoxy and abstract models of markets have been countered in market studies with attention to individual markets and individual instances of marketization. They have probed specific market systems dynamics (Giesler & Fischer, 2017), the design of digitalized markets (Hagberg & Kjellberg, 2020), how markets are made (Geiger, Kjellberg, & Spencer, 2012), how areas of social life are marketized (Zelizer, 1979), and how markets are agenced (Cochoy, Trompette, & Araujo, 2016). But multiple markets challenge the focus on individual, well-defined markets, central to CMC as well as to market studies more generally.

Are multiple markets common to such an extent that most markets can be conceived, at the same time, as instances of multiple markets? Are established concepts helpful for understanding multiple markets, and what conceptual developments are called for to better understand multiple markets?

Continue reading

Pesquisa Social e Políticas públicas na Pandemia

¿Qué significa gobernar con el mercado?

[Mañana viernes 26 de Junio presentaré a la distancia en el coloquio del Centro de Derecho, Filosofía y Política de la Universidad Católica de Valparaiso. Abajo van las coordenadas. Si hay alguien interesad@ por ahí, mandenme un correo para recibir el link]

Coloquio de Filosofía del Derecho, Derecho Penal y Teoría Política. El experimento chileno: ¿Qué significa gobernar con el mercado? El caso de la salud. José Ossandón. Hora: 26 jun 2020 09:30 AM Santiago.

Mariana Luzzi reflexiona sobre la docencia online

[Mariana Luzzi comparte sus reflexiones sobre las nuevas prácticas de docencia y colaboración que se abren con el experimento obligado de docencia a la distancia en que terminamos siendo parte. Así empieza]

“¿Qué plataforma estás usando para las clases? ¿Hiciste vivo de Instagram? ¿Se puede bajar el video después? ¿Usaste la encuesta del Moodle? ¿Alguien sabe cómo se hace para ponerle audio a una presentación de diapositivas?

Hace tres meses el chat de nuestro equipo docente explotó. Los mensajes comenzaron a llegar en cascada, desafiando las memorias de nuestros celulares. A cualquier hora circulaban preguntas, tips compartidos, tutoriales, links a todo tipo de recurso virtual. Los intercambios se parecían más a la mesa de ayuda de un canal de tecnología que a un espacio de trabajo entre profesionales de las ciencias sociales.

Desde que empezó la cuarentena quienes nos dedicamos a la docencia nos vimos obligados a aprender en tiempo récord a usar herramientas que hasta ahora no conocíamos (como las diversas plataformas de videoconferencias), o que nunca habíamos pensado como medios para dar clase (como las redes sociales) o que veníamos usando de manera sólo marginal (como el aula virtual de la universidad)”

El texto completo acá: https://noticiasungs.ungs.edu.ar/?portfolio=ensenanzas-y-aprendizajes-docentes-en-la-pandemia&fbclid=IwAR27vucgJWzyM4w3yqgud9uXDgvnQ6oTFPaDYwNYQnclQSmSOmP27fYY5Qo

Madariaga en podcast sobre variedades del capitalismo

Aldo Madariaga habla sobre “Variedades del Capitalismo” en el podcast de Alfredo Joignant. Este es el link: https://www.tele13radio.cl/t13radio/site/artic/20200615/pags/20200615161023.html

Appel à candidatures 2020: recherche doctorale CSI-Paris

Appel à candidatures 2020: recherche doctorale, contrat doctoral

Projet thématique : « La construction des marchés du vrac »

Le Centre de sociologie de l’innovation (CSI) de Mines ParisTech, Université PSL, lance un appel à candidatures visant à recruter un.e doctorant.e pour la rentrée de l’année académique 2020-2021. Le doctorat est réalisé au sein du CSI sous la direction de chercheur.e.s de ce centre, et s’inscrit dans le cadre de la spécialité doctorale STS (Sciences, techniques, sociétés) du programme doctoral en sciences sociales de l’école doctorale SDOSE (ED 543, «Sciences de la décision, des organisations, de la société et de l’échange») de l’Université PSL.

Cette recherche doctorale est co-financée par l’ADEME et par l’entreprise Bulk & Co, un des acteurs français du marché de l’équipement commercial pour la vente en vrac. Elle donnera lieu à un contrat de travail à temps plein d’une durée de trois ans, débutant en Octobre 2020. Elle s’insère dans les lignes scientifiques actuelles du CSI, et notamment dans la thématique « Marchés en société : dynamiques de concernement et processus de valorisation ».

Cfps__Theme Calls_Valuation Studies

[Dos nuevos llamados a contribur en Valuation Studies]

In 2020, Valuation Studies initiated a new phase. As the editorial ‘Towards a Reformulation’ explains in more detail, we call this new phase valuation as a problem. The overall aim of this new phase is to strengthen Valuation Studies as a platform for curated academic conversations on valuation. In order to achieve this goal, we have introduced an important shift in how we manage submissions. New submissions will need to be in relation to an open Theme Call. The purpose of this change is to foster a more focused discussion around particular issues of valuation.

Theme Calls are curated by the journal’s editorial board and guest editors. The process to contribute to Theme Calls has two steps. First, authors are invited to formally manifest interest in the call by submitting an extended abstract (maximum 1000 words). The abstract will be evaluated by the editors of the Theme. Second, papers resulting from accepted proposals will then undergo an anonymous peer-review process. Depending on the submissions and accepted papers, Theme Calls will become special sections, an issue or several issues in Valuation Studies. There are two Theme Calls currently open.

Theme call 1: Valuation as a semiotic, narrative, and dramaturgical problem: re-opening the toolbox of valuation studies. Editors: Fabian Muniesa (Mines ParisTech), José Ossandón (Copenhagen Business School) (more information about the call here).

Theme call 2: Digitizing Valuation. Editors: Francis Lee (Chalmers University of Technology), Andrea Mennicken (London School of Economics), Jacob Reilley (Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg), Malte Ziewitz (Cornell University) (more information about the call here).

 

Madariaga VS Fábrega: Qué debería hacer el Banco Central?

Quien lo hubiera pensado. Dos antiguos colaboradores de este blog, Aldo Madariaga y Jorge Fábrega son los expertos que debaten hoy en CIPER sobre la independencia del Banco Central de Chile en tiempos de crisis.

En su columna, Madariaga usa literatura de economía política comparada para argumentar que lo que el Banco Central hace es administrar una independencia que es relativa. Lo que las crisis recientes muestran es que los Bancos Centrales tienen roles y hierramientas que van mucho más allá de controlar la inflación. Desde esta perspectiva, orientarse solo a mantener la inflación baja es una decisión crítica. En su columna, Fábrega usa argumentos de elección racional para defender la idea de que el Banco Central no puede desviarse de su tarea de controlar la inflación. Fábrega pelea con la clásica imagen de un estado populista pre-neoliberal que se dejaría llevar por todo tipo de demandas. Los economistas del Banco Central como un cinturón de castidad para disciplinar las bajas pasiones políticas. Sería interesante oir que dice Fabrega del tipo de intervención que Madariaga usa en su texto que más que a un tipo de Estado pre-neoliberalismo, corresponden más bien a intervenciones de Bancos Centrales en contextos de neoliberalismo avanzado (para ponerle un nombre a lo que sea que es los EEUU y la EU post-2008).