Tag Archives: Aspers

The concept of market (Part 2)

[El nombre de esta sección es “artículos en cuotas”. La idea es, como en una novela por entregas, ir subiendo partes de papers a medida que vayan saliendo. El texto abajo es un borrador de un artículo en el que trabajo. Presenté la primera versión en EGOS este año y esto que estoy subiendo acá es una segunda versión, pero aun, borrador y sin edición del inglés. Además de la introducción, el artículo se compondrá de cuatro secciones. Cada parte será una entrega que iré subiendo a medida que tenga las nuevas versiones listas. El texto abajo es la segunda entrega y la primera sección del artículo (ver acá la entrega anterior, la introducción). Como siempre, sugerencias son muy bienvenidas]

The concept of Market

José Ossandón, draft 4/12/2017

Concepts of markets after market design

The following extract is taken from a talk given by the winner of the 2012 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Memory of Alfred Nobel and renowned market designer Alvin Roth:

‘So, first of all think about market design, because market design is an ancient human activity. But because markets are so pervasive we think them a little bit like language. Languages and markets are both human artifacts. But we don’t think of language as something we can change, but as something we get. I speak to you in English and I have to speak in the same kind of English that you speak, otherwise it wouldn’t work. Often we think of markets on that way too: markets just happen. But, of course, markets are human artifacts and market design is that engineering part of microeconomics, that part that fixes markets when they are broken or make new ones sometimes.’ [i]

Roth presents a constructivist approach. He emphasizes that markets are both, like language, a social product, and like other artifacts, the outcome of purposely applied technical knowledge. This description would easily fit recent sociological accounts of markets; but, it would appear as strange in the context of traditional conceptualizations of markets in economics.

A dominant position in the economic sciences of the second half of the 20th century conceived markets in opposition to organization. While organizations were associated to features such as planning, hierarchy, or centralized decision making; markets were seen as decentralized, spontaneous and even inherently non-designable entities. Continue reading

The concept of market (Part 1)

[El nombre de esta sección es “artículos en cuotas”. La idea es, como en una novela por entregas, ir subiendo partes de papers a medida que vayan saliendo. El texto abajo es un borrador de la introducción de un artículo en el que trabajo. Presenté la primera versión en EGOS este año y esto que estoy subiendo acá es una segunda versión, pero aun, borrador y sin edición del inglés. Además de la introducción, el artículo se compondrá de cuatro partes. Cada parte será una entrega que iré subiendo a medida que tenga las nuevas versiones listas. Como siempre, sugerencias son muy bienvenidas]

The concept of Market

José Ossandón, draft 30/11/2017

Introduction

The emergence of the broad set of practices and techniques grouped under the label of ‘market design’ makes apparent a challenge that has been avoided for too long in organizational and sociological studies of markets. The challenge can be illustrated with the example of school place allocation.

School allocation is a policy instrument increasingly popular among governments and policy makers. It consists in implementing algorithms to match two set of priorities; families’ preferred schools and schools’ available vacancies. School allocation is also one of the most recognized examples of ‘market design’ (Cantillon 2017). Markets designers label situations such as school place allocations, which do not feature some of the basic elements included in traditional social scientific definitions of markets (for instance: money, prices, or the transference of property rights), as market. In this context, social researchers interested in inspecting a situation like school place allocation are pushed to ask themselves a basic question: should the social researcher follow the definitions of markets accepted in their academic fields or they should take the definitions of market designers? In the following pages, I expect to demonstrate that school allocation is not merely a marginal example. It is “an extreme case” (Flyvbjerg 2006) that can be productively used as a provocation to initiate a broader discussion about the concept of market. Continue reading

CfP: New Economic Sociology and Sociology: Where Do They Meet? Where Do They Diverge? 

Workshops: Bringing The New Economic Sociology Back Into the Sociological Analysis, Warsaw, 22-23 May 2017. Submission of extended abstract – 1,000 words: 10 December 2016.

Economic sociology got established as an approach to economic phenomena with the tools of sociology. This was relaunched in the 1980s in close association with the thesis of social embeddedness of economic action, and it continues to flourish and develop ever since. Hence, the embeddedness theoretical foundation was supplemented with other strong assumptions regarding power, institutions, social networks, as well as uncertainty, unintended consequences and fictional expectations. While, in addition to the US branch of new economic sociology, other related schools soon came along, such as the distinct European platforms. The sociological dimension of new economic sociology notwithstanding, it is also observable, especially in the case of the generic European approach, that this is rather loosely coupled with sociology. New economic sociology makes use of sociological concepts and theories in addressing economic phenomena. But it directs this framing mainly towards economics, theory of organizations, new institutionalism and the study of social networks. This brings a sociological or sociologically informed perspective on economic phenomena to the attention of these disciplines. Yet it rarely uses insights gained by new economic sociology in order to build a bridge to, reinterpret or update the traditional or contemporary sociological framings. This state of affairs leads to the situation that even though new economic sociology builds on sociology, and it is presented as a sub-field of it, this also runs the risk of diverting from sociology, and of becoming a new sociology altogether.

In line with these observable trends, the Workshop aims to inquire whether this trend towards loose coupling, and even decoupling, is universal or rather particular to specific branches of new economic sociology? What elements determine whether new economic sociology and sociology appear as more or less coupled/decoupled? How is the tricky relation between new economic sociology and sociology probable to develop? What can sociology learn from new economic sociology? How to bring new economic sociology back into the sociological explanations? The Workshop invites papers related to the following themes: Continue reading

Identidades en los mercados: una agenda de investigación

Quisiera empezar con un necesario agradecimiento a José Ossandón y a todos los creadores de Estudios de la Economía por mantener este importante punto de encuentro y discusión para investigadoras e investigadores que intentan comprender la economía desde lo social. Extiendo la gratitud por mantener las fronteras de la definición de lo que sea hacerlo suficientemente amplias para que distintas perspectivas disciplinarias puedan sumarse, y no competir, para mejor comprender lo que hacen y como significan humanos (y no humanos!) las trocas económicas. Agregarme al blog es encontrar algunos viejos amigos (en pasado nos encontramos en tierras extranjeras) y, estoy cierto, hacer otros. No puedo pensar en mejor espacio para compartir algunas inquietudes intelectuales y ojalá recibir los aportes de compañeras y compañeros de estudios sociales de la economía.

En este sentido, me gustaría estrenar mi participación compartiendo abajo lo que es mi agenda de investigación actual. Yo busco comprender las condiciones de producción y negociación identitária de individuos y grupos en medio a la acción mercantil, en contextos de (i) inserción de poblaciones periféricas en los circuitos globales del capital y (ii) diversidad sociocultural, en que se renegocian papeles y reputaciones de los agentes más allá del mercado. Creo que comprender los sentidos de la acción económica para los actores mismos requiere analizar el conjunto de relaciones – materiales, culturales, políticas y sociales – y trayectorias personales en que las transacciones están insertas y con las cuales se entrelazan. Solamente así se pueden revelar proyectos personales y colectivos más amplios, no puramente materiales e inclusive identitários, que orientan actores en sus intercambios mercantiles y a los cuales se subordinan transacciones y su sentido para los actores. Continue reading

Cfp_Score International Conference on Organizing Markets

Call for Papers. Score International Conference on Organizing Markets. October 16-17, 2014. Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden. Abstract submission Deadline: March 31, 2014. Organized by Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (Score). Keynote speaker: Neil Fligstein, University of California, Berkeley. Continue reading

Entrevista con Jens Beckert: incertidumbre, mercados y sociología económica

En mayo del presente año realizamos junto con Marcin Serafin una entrevista a Jens Beckert, director del “Max Planck Institut for the Study of Societies” de Colonia, Alemania. La entrevista será publicada en inglés, pero acá compartimos algunas de las preguntas que hemos traducido al español para el blog Estudios de la Economía. Continue reading